Blog Posting Due Monday, March 3, 2014:
Summary
Chapter 9, “Everyone’s an Author”
discusses the saturation of authorship as the Internet has made writing easier
and an audience for that writing always present. Baron discusses that writing has changed from
the scribes’ role of replication to the modern quest for originality. To explore modern day publication, Baron uses
the blog as a case study. He discusses
that blogs are mainly written by teenagers, but also have been upheld in courts
for politicians and reporters. Schools,
keeping the tradition of trying to exclude technology, often censor blogs, and
this censorship is upheld in courts.
Chapter 10, “A Space of One’s Own,”
discusses the proliferation of MySpace and Facebook as a new type of public,
personal space. Baron also discusses
Wikipedia and the issue it represents of whether truth is best maintained by
open content or closely guarded content.
Baron uses Wikipedia as an example of how digital spaces are reinventing
the roles of writers and readers: “The very existence of multiple, ongoing
authorship—the essence of the wiki text—forces us to rethink the roles of
reader and writer” (p. 206).
Chapter 11, “The Dark Side of the
Web,” discusses the negative aspects of the web such as hate groups and
censorship. For example, Baron discusses
the irony of Google being a free disseminator of information in the United
States, but agreeing to censor that information in China in order to tap into
their seemingly boundless Internet audience.
He uses this point to demonstrate that although the Internet is often
seen as a limitless source of free information, this information is not neutral
and is curated for us, whether by censors or by algorithms.
Chapter 12, “From Pencils to
Pixels,” Baron sums up his book with a few cautions and questions about where
the current digital writing revolution will go in the future. Baron discusses some ironies of the
information age. For instance, although
information seems more freely accessible than ever, companies maintaining
proprietary information closely guard this information. In addition, this information, even though it
does not tax resources for paper or pencils, still requires natural, finite
resources-specifically, all those digital tools run off of electricity and
“server farms” (Baron, 2009, p. 240). Finally,
Baron ends with a question of where this digital writing and reading will take
us next.
Critique
The theme from this reading that
most interested me was the theme of curation.
This theme was discussed in Chapter 11.
I think that most people think of the Internet as a tool for democratizing
information-information there is perceived as free to all, searchable as long
as the user types in the correct search terms.
However, most users rarely think about this information being curated
for them. They are only seeing
information that algorithms deem worthy.
In places like China, where government dictates and filters that
information, users only see what the government and companies such as Google
have contracted to reveal. The
interesting and, perhaps unnerving, side of this is that I don’t think people
understand that information on the Internet is filtered in any way. The perception is that the Internet is freely
distributed information. I think this is
an important issue to be educated about because we need to be mindful of what
information is available and how this information is being censored or curated.
Connection
I am currently working on a project
in which I help students build websites to be advocates for a chosen social
issue. This project is more important to
me than ever as I think it teaches students to use the Internet for more
academic, socially important issues. I
value this time to teach students about writing in these spaces especially as
Baron points out that schools have traditionally tried to censor or ban
students’ online writing. I think one of
the issues that Baron points out is teaching students not only how to find
information online, but also teaching them how this information may also be
filtered. I don’t think this is
something that average students are aware of.
I'm really glad you raised the issue of democratization, Emily. But as I was reading your post, I wondered what you thought about the "democratization" of knowledge theme that we've been discussing this semester and how you thought it squared with Baron's observations about the "dark side of the web." Can society control writing technologies on the web without sacrificing democratization? I've talked to a number of Chinese people about the government's suppression of information, and I've been surprised by the number of folks who argue that they WANT the government to control what is available. They say that they don't want to "stumble upon" pornography, hate speech, and the other dark sides of the web that Baron describes. What do you think?
ReplyDelete