Blog Post for January 20, 2014
Boorstin,
Ch. 60-
Summary
of Main Points:
In this chapter, Boorstin discusses
that memory was not only a skill, but an almost sacred virtue in ancient
times. He discusses that memory was
valued and even taught, urging those wanting to improve their memory to
associate memories with images and store the in rooms as if the mind was a
cathedral with infinite rooms to connect images and memories. However, as the invention of the printed word
became more and more of a possibility as printed pages solved some of the
problems of the roll, people began to value memory less. Socrates predicted that this substitution of
the written word for memory would cause learners to become forgetful.
Critique
of the Reading:
I thought Boorstin’s discussion of
memory as not only a skill, but a virtue was interesting and made me question
my lack of value for memory. The
ancients seemed to equate memory with a person’s learning and virtue, and I have
never placed much esteem in memory. Especially as an educator, I always
prioritized writing, critical reading, and reasoning skills and was not a
teacher who focused upon memory as a skill.
When some of my colleagues would make their students memorize poetry, I
often wondered what value such a practice had for students. However, this reading made me appreciate
memory more, especially as I think about the reading I have done so far in The Shallows, which suggests that the
Internet may be decreasing our ability to focus and retain information. I wonder if my lack of reverence for memory
has been a mistake.
Application
of the Reading:
This reading on memory made me think
of the latest news about Alzheimer’s disease.
I seem to be hearing more and more about this disease in the news,
whether that is because the disease is actually increasing or more Americans
are aging, I am unsure. As I was reading
an article on Alzheimer’s (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/17/opinion/sunday/alzheimers-anxiety.html?_r=0),
I was struck by just how much damage a loss of memory can do. It is not simply an inability to recall facts
and figures, our memory is tied to our memories, our past, and our fundamental
identities. Thus, maybe we should focus
more on the skill of memory and not completely ignore memory as a skill to be
retained and developed. Maybe memory is
still important even now that our written word is easier than ever to record
and distribute.
I found your discussion on Boorstin and his emphasis on memory (both in the ancient times and the lack thereof today) very interesting. I agree with you that as time has moved on people have been dedicating less and less time to memorization, and that this might not necessarily be a good thing. Not having read The Shallows yet, I can’t comment much on your remarks there but I do think that the Internet is not helping us retain memory—especially as a culture. Why should people learn the historical facts of their country when they could just look it up on Wikipedia? Not only does memory have to do with personal, individual identity, but it also has to do with a collective, cultural identity. The loss of such a thing could prove detrimental in the long run…
ReplyDelete